On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one package where the
Makefile was being patched to remove -g from CXXFLAGS but -Werror on the same
line was
On 03.05.2013 10:06, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one package where the
Makefile was being patched to remove -g from
On 3 May 2013 16:36, Kacper Kowalik xarthis...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03.05.2013 10:06, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 3 May 2013 12:09, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:06:01 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally I've always thought -Werror is a mistake in release code,
but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from
packages I maintain. That will change now, upon learning of this
policy.
Debian
On 05/03/2013 09:46 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:06:01 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally I've always thought -Werror is a mistake in release code,
but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from
packages I maintain. That will
On 05/03/2013 03:46 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Fri, 3 May 2013 16:06:01 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally I've always thought -Werror is a mistake in release code,
but was accepted practice. I've almost never actively removed it from
packages I maintain. That will
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:15 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't need that. We already get QA warnings for severe compiler
warnings with a note that it should be reported upstream.
Turning them into errors does not improve anything.
Yup - you can't really compare Gentoo build
On Fri, 03 May 2013 16:15:35 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't need that.
I was actually firmly agreeing on that point. The question was where
this was all coming from, and I was pointing out that it's regarded as
inherently good elsewhere.
We already get QA warnings for
Dne Pá 3. května 2013 10:39:29, Rich Freeman napsal(a):
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:15 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
We don't need that. We already get QA warnings for severe compiler
warnings with a note that it should be reported upstream.
Turning them into errors does not
Most of the bugs filed on the gcc 4.8 tracker so far have been caused by
packages being built with -Werror. I just noticed one package where the
Makefile was being patched to remove -g from CXXFLAGS but -Werror on the same
line was left in. Just in case people weren't aware, building with
Ryan Hill wrote:
If you're fixing one of these bugs by silencing the warning be sure
to remove the flag also.
How about sending the fix upstream instead?
Thanks, from an upstream
//Peter
pgpHGm3ZpE6z3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
11 matches
Mail list logo