On Thu, 04 Jul 2013 09:31:35 -0700
Brian Dolbec wrote:
> Thank you for the extra effort. I appreciate it, although for the
> one I had recently, it made it harder. I had just migrated the
> ebuild to the new python eclasses. So the diff included the reversal
> of those changes too.
That happene
On Thu, 2013-07-04 at 16:50 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> For a good while now, I have been obsoleting ebuild attachments on as
> yet unassigned bug reports and pasting proper unified diffs into
> comments. I have been doing this so that the maintainers of these
> ebuilds see the actual changes in
On 04-07-2013 16:50:51 +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Unfortunately, this means that I sometimes get credit for posting
> such comments. Please make note of the ebuild/diff replacement and
> attribute the changes correctly to the submitter, not the messenger. I
> shouldn't be getting the credit for
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Unfortunately, this means that I sometimes get credit for posting
> such comments. Please make note of the ebuild/diff replacement and
> attribute the changes correctly to the submitter, not the messenger. I
> shouldn't be getting the credit
For a good while now, I have been obsoleting ebuild attachments on as
yet unassigned bug reports and pasting proper unified diffs into
comments. I have been doing this so that the maintainers of these
ebuilds see the actual changes instead of a giant blob of code that the
submitter of the ebuild mi
