Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-26 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 19:50:28 -0500 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | One thing I'm not getting out of this, is why y'all can't just abuse | the looser grouped layout of eclasses under g33, and implement it | within that dir... Well, the original idea was just for tidiness... -- Ciaran

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 02:49:28AM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:47:03 +0100 > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:27:12 +0300 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > | Dan Meltzer wrote: > > | > I can see the use for a category one

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Marius Mauch
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 14:47:03 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:27:12 +0300 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Dan Meltzer wrote: > | > I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a > | > package-local one, if you're going to h

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 25 April 2005 10:27 am, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:20:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > | you should go into the mail archives and review the superior solution > | that was hashed out ... i think it was called 'elibs'/'esource' or > | something

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Elfyn McBratney
On Monday 25 Apr 2005 15:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2005 08:43 am, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > > The other night, some of us in #gentoo-uk got talking about per-category > > and per-package eclasses > > you mean Bug 69714 i filed ~6 months ago ? ;) Ah, you see .. ciaranm didn't te

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:20:32 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | you should go into the mail archives and review the superior solution | that was hashed out ... i think it was called 'elibs'/'esource' or | something elibs is something else. -- Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (V

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 25 April 2005 08:43 am, Elfyn McBratney wrote: > The other night, some of us in #gentoo-uk got talking about per-category > and per-package eclasses you mean Bug 69714 i filed ~6 months ago ? ;) you should go into the mail archives and review the superior solution that was hashed out .

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 09:54:27 -0400 Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I like the idea. cron.eclass would definitely fit in | sys-process/eclass/ (although could we move existing eclasses | anyways?). Long-term, yes, at least if things are implemented the way I was thinking when I was talki

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Aaron Walker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Elfyn McBratney wrote: > Hi folks, > > The other night, some of us in #gentoo-uk got talking about per-category and > per-package eclasses, the idea being that each category, and each package, > could have it's own 'eclass' subdirectory containing c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:27:12 +0300 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Dan Meltzer wrote: | > I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a | > package-local one, if you're going to have it specific for one | > package, why not just put it in the ebuild, and have no eclas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 25/04/2005-15:27:12(+0300): Marius Mauch types > Dan Meltzer wrote: > >I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a > >package-local one, if you're going to have it specific for one > >package, why not just put it in the ebuild, and have no eclass at all? > > Actuall

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Marius Mauch
Dan Meltzer wrote: I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a package-local one, if you're going to have it specific for one package, why not just put it in the ebuild, and have no eclass at all? Actually I'd say the opposite: There is definitely a use for package-local ecl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Dan Meltzer
I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a package-local one, if you're going to have it specific for one package, why not just put it in the ebuild, and have no eclass at all? On 4/25/05, Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > The other night, some of

[gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses

2005-04-25 Thread Elfyn McBratney
Hi folks, The other night, some of us in #gentoo-uk got talking about per-category and per-package eclasses, the idea being that each category, and each package, could have it's own 'eclass' subdirectory containing category- or package-local eclasses. This in addition to having global eclasses