On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 17:08 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 14:30 -0700, Corey Shields wrote:
I think that nomirror should be used as seldom as possible. Licensing
issues
are legit. We've had one case where mirror admins complained about a file
that was too big
On Thu, 5 May 2005 14:04:20 -0700 Robin H. Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I've tried to dig through our policy documents, to find the policy
| regarding RESTRICT=mirror/fetch. I don't find anything in the htdocs
| tree from CVS, beyond a few brief mentions in the handbook.
Some of it's in the
On Thursday 05 May 2005 02:04 pm, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Unless there is something I've missed, why do we have ebuilds with
RESTRICT=nomirror, having a GPL-2 license, and distributed via
sourceforge? Wouldn't RESTRICT=primaryuri be much better? Most fetches
would go to SF first, and we'd
Mike Frysinger wrote:
[snip]
RESTRICT=[no]mirror
---
- Files too large for the mirrors? (What is the size limit?)
yes ...
We should probably have a hard definition for this or expectations to the rule
too. Let me look through our current distfiles and see how big we really
Corey Shields wrote:
On Thursday 05 May 2005 03:06 pm, Lance Albertson wrote:
We could make a couple of bugs for each category and get those folks to
fixing them. But then that would require a lot of work and I know we're all
just a bunch of lazy bums anyways ;)
I smell a new dev
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 07:37:07AM +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
I know only one mirror network who could worth the hassle: cpan.
Perl has a nice geographically distributed network of mirrors. Too bad
portage can't automatically select the closest cpan mirror. :(
You can already put in specific
