Zac Medico posted on Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:31:24 -0800 as excerpted:
On 12/17/2012 09:59 PM, Duncan wrote:
[1] I long ago filed a bug suggesting a new world-sets line for
depclean,
but I expect it'll be resolved/fixed about the time sets support
finally gets unmasked to ~arch, the status of
On 12/18/2012 12:26 AM, Duncan wrote:
Zac Medico posted on Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:31:24 -0800 as excerpted:
On 12/17/2012 09:59 PM, Duncan wrote:
[1] I long ago filed a bug suggesting a new world-sets line for
depclean,
but I expect it'll be resolved/fixed about the time sets support
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:57:43 -0400
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I have implemented merging of sets (more or less) in a local
portage branch.
Could you elaborate how the implementation of sets would differ from:
# emerge $(cat /var/lib/portage/myset)
where /var/lib/portage/myset is
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 07:22, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
# emerge $(cat /var/lib/portage/myset)
y'all are killing me
emerge $( /var/lib/portage/myset )
/pet_peeve :p
--
Chris White
Gentoo Developer aka:
ChrisWhite
cpw
ChrisWhite|Work
WhiteChocolate
VanillaWhite
Whitey
WhiteLight
WhiteCheese
Chris White wrote:
y'all are killing me
So are you:
--
Chris White
Gentoo Developer aka:
ChrisWhite
cpw
ChrisWhite|Work
WhiteChocolate
VanillaWhite
Whitey
WhiteLight
WhiteCheese
WhiteSugar
WhiteButter
WhiteWall
WhiteLemon
WhiteApple
WhiteBlanket
WhiteEnergy
WhiteWhite
cab go
So I have implemented merging of sets (more or less) in a local portage
branch. However there are some use cases for which the appopriate
action is ambiguous.
Use Case #1:
Set1 = { postfix, gentoolkit, lsof, bind-utils, vixie-cron }
A set of standard tools to be on a machine. Assume a new
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 04:57, Alec Warner wrote:
So I have implemented merging of sets (more or less) in a local portage
branch. However there are some use cases for which the appopriate
action is ambiguous.
Use Case #1:
Set1 = { postfix, gentoolkit, lsof, bind-utils, vixie-cron }
Where
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:57:43 -0400 Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| So I have implemented merging of sets (more or less) in a local
| portage branch.
Aah, good to see that you're picking up one of the more useful Paludis
features.
For those who aren't aware of how Paludis handles this...
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:57:43 -0400
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I have implemented merging of sets (more or less) in a local
portage branch.
Could you elaborate how the implementation of sets would differ from:
# emerge $(cat /var/lib/portage/myset)
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 18:56:05 +0200 Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| For those who aren't aware of how Paludis handles this... File sets
| are a text file that live in repodir/sets/ or confdir/sets/ and are
| named setname.conf. Lines can be in the form *atom ,
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 10:44, Simon Stelling wrote:
head -n4 $(~/.sig) ~/.sig
seriously, when did this turn into the forums ? well at least he doesnt have
a 640x480 animated gif in there (yet?) ...
-mike
pgpaBmIXK5PiT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 14:22, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 01:41:26PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
seriously, when did this turn into the forums ? well at least he doesnt
have a 640x480 animated gif in there (yet?) ...
Actually there's an 80x80 px limit for avatars and
12 matches
Mail list logo
