Pacho Ramos schrieb:
El jue, 17-07-2014 a las 23:14 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
I recently noticed this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502836
imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for all arches as
KEYWORDS are set in eclass depending on
El jue, 17-07-2014 a las 23:14 +0200, Thomas Sachau escribió:
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
I recently noticed this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502836
imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for all arches as
KEYWORDS are set in eclass depending on E_STATE=release. That
On 17/07/14 21:56, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
I guess we'll have to wait until vapier's back to get it done, tho..
imlib2 is basically normal autotools based package, there is no need to
tie it to this specific
eclass
it should be extremely trivial to revision bump it to use normal eutils,
I recently noticed this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502836
imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for all arches as
KEYWORDS are set in eclass depending on E_STATE=release. That has an
important drawback as forces all arches to be done at the same time and,
since some are
On 7/17/14, 2:28 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I recently noticed this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502836
imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for all arches as
KEYWORDS are set in eclass depending on E_STATE=release. That has an
important drawback as forces all arches to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/07/14 08:28 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I recently noticed this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502836
imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for all arches
as KEYWORDS are set in eclass depending on E_STATE=release. That
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/07/14 08:28 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I recently noticed this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502836
imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:23:20 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think that sticking KEYWORDS in an eclass is something that should
probably never happen.
It used to be banned by PMS, for other reasons...
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
El jue, 17-07-2014 a las 17:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:23:20 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think that sticking KEYWORDS in an eclass is something that should
probably never happen.
It used to be banned by PMS, for other reasons...
I have
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:28:47 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El jue, 17-07-2014 a las 17:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:23:20 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think that sticking KEYWORDS in an eclass is something that
should probably
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:23:20 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think that sticking KEYWORDS in an eclass is something that should
probably never happen.
It used to be banned by PMS, for other reasons...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/07/14 02:28 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 17-07-2014 a las 17:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:23:20 -0400 Rich Freeman
ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think that sticking KEYWORDS in an eclass is something that
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 17/07/14 02:28 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 17-07-2014 a las 17:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 10:23:20 -0400 Rich Freeman
ri...@gentoo.org
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:40:02 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I agree that it isn't a PMS issue - it is a tree quality issue. PMS
doesn't prohibit introducing packages straight to stable, dropping
stable packages, etc. These are all tree quality issues and a matter
of policy.
The
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 16:40:02 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I agree that it isn't a PMS issue - it is a tree quality issue. PMS
doesn't prohibit introducing packages straight to stable, dropping
Pacho Ramos schrieb:
I recently noticed this:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502836
imlib2 ebuild can only be stabilized in one round for all arches as
KEYWORDS are set in eclass depending on E_STATE=release. That has an
important drawback as forces all arches to be done at the
On Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:14:20 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
You know that a KEYWORDS variable set in the ebuild after the inherit
line does overwrite anything set by the eclass?
Well, the issue is that KEYWORDS is one of the few metadata variables
that doesn't get merged somehow,
17 matches
Mail list logo
