Ahoj,
log from #gentoo-portage:
tampakrap zmedico: (random idea) would it make sence to generate
local.use.desc in /var/cache, or somewhere in /var, but out of the
tree?
tampakrap because now cvs sees it as unknown file, which prints out
warning in update and collision in commit
tampakrap (commit
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Since .cvsignore is needed either way, I'm going to do it in three
days if there are no objections. But I'd like some feedback for the
move of the file in /var. Opinions?
considering the server generates it and the end user never does,
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:31 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Since .cvsignore is needed either way, I'm going to do it in three
days if there are no objections. But I'd like some feedback for the
move of the file in
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:45 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:31 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Since .cvsignore is needed either way, I'm going to do it in three
days if there are no
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:45 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:37:31 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 10:11:44 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Since .cvsignore is needed
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:11:44PM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
log from #gentoo-portage:
tampakrap zmedico: (random idea) would it make sence to generate
local.use.desc in /var/cache, or somewhere in /var, but out of the
tree?
Why are we keeping it? I move that we remove it. It's been
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 12:45:22 Paul Varner wrote:
On 04/24/12 11:21, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 04:11:44PM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
log from #gentoo-portage: tampakrap zmedico: (random idea) would
it make sence to generate local.use.desc in /var/cache, or
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
it's also a bit of a speed issue. i often want to look at what flags get used
across the tree. what's faster: loading + parsing 15000 xml files, or loading
1 file ? shifting it to metadata/ as a cache of all the xml
