Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed update to pax-utils.eclass

2013-03-27 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le dimanche 24 mars 2013 à 20:20 -0400, Anthony G. Basile a écrit : Last call, does anyone have a problem with me updating the pax-utils.eclass? See Ref [3] above for the code. I'll wait a couple more days and then do it. looks like last conditional branch for XT marking in pax-mark

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed update to pax-utils.eclass

2013-03-27 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote: Le dimanche 24 mars 2013 à 20:20 -0400, Anthony G. Basile a écrit : Last call, does anyone have a problem with me updating the pax-utils.eclass? See Ref [3] above for the code. I'll wait a couple more days and then

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed update to pax-utils.eclass

2013-03-24 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 03/17/2013 08:19 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: Hi everyone, The hardened team has been working on getting PaX markings moved to Extended Attributes rather then putting them in a program header of the ELF binaries [1]. The motivation here is that this is a generally safer way of doing PaX

[gentoo-dev] Proposed update to pax-utils.eclass

2013-03-17 Thread Anthony G. Basile
Hi everyone, The hardened team has been working on getting PaX markings moved to Extended Attributes rather then putting them in a program header of the ELF binaries [1]. The motivation here is that this is a generally safer way of doing PaX markings since mangling an ELF binary can break