Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/27/2011 11:13 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 15:05 Wed 27 Apr , Samuli Suominen wrote: >> The way of setting default URI handlers has changed since >> dev-libs/glib-2.28 and above. If you used the GConf registry to set >> them before, they will now be ignored. > > Do you think all our

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 15:05 Wed 27 Apr , Samuli Suominen wrote: > The way of setting default URI handlers has changed since > dev-libs/glib-2.28 and above. If you used the GConf registry to set > them before, they will now be ignored. Do you think all our users will even understand what this means? Can you pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 04/26/2011 09:56 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so > bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). > > See attachment. Based on some comments posted here, and IRC, here is an updated news item. Title: Upgrade to G

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-26 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 5:41 AM, Alec Warner wrote: > Can you link to the bug in the news item? > Hmmm, not sure how relevant the polkit vulnerability is to the news item. It's supposed to be about setting mimetype handler information; not to explain the reason why glib is going stable. -- ~Ni

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-26 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Alex Alexander wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:56:06PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: >> You have 24 hours to comment on this news item.  Sorry to put it so >> bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). >> >> See attachment. > > Should be wr

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-26 Thread Alex Alexander
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:56:06PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: > You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so > bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). > > See attachment. Should be wrapped at 72 chars, but looks good otherwise, thanks :) > Title:

[gentoo-dev] RFC: 24 hour review for >= dev-libs/glib-2.28 stable news item

2011-04-26 Thread Samuli Suominen
You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973). See attachment. Title: Upgrade to GLIB 2.28 Author: GNOME Team Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2011-04-26 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: