Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-13 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/13/2012 12:42 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote: Alexandre Rostovtsev schrieb: Users know a package's natural name, not the occasionally cryptic ebuild name, and certainly not the category. If I want to install a game called Neverwinter Nights, it

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-13 Thread Luca Barbato
On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application name) to packages. Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to LibreOffice Writer in package metadata. How

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-13 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Markos, there are also webapps. -- Fabio Erculiani http://lxnay.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-13 Thread Kent Fredric
On 13 February 2012 21:35, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: This field wont be useful to users but to GUI applications that want to show a pretty name instead of a weird PN. It would be fully optional but it would have a standard syntax. You can't use longdesription for that to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 11-02-2012 19:02:12 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application name) to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-12 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application name) to packages. Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to LibreOffice Writer in package metadata. How about expanding metadata.xml (adding to its .dtd) to also support this? I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-12 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Paweł Hajdan, wrote: On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application name) to packages. Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to LibreOffice Writer in package metadata. [Replying to a random message in this

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-12 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:14:42 -0500 Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 20:37 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Paweł Hajdan, wrote: On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-12 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:22 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: And AFAICS there's no 'nwn' in SRC_URI so it's just pointless to abbreviate the name like that in our ebuild name. nwn is the name of the game's main executable and the standard abbreviation for Neverwinter Nights in the rpg community.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-12 Thread James Broadhead
On 12 February 2012 21:34, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:22 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: And AFAICS there's no 'nwn' in SRC_URI so it's just pointless to abbreviate the name like that in our ebuild name. nwn is the name of the game's main executable

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-12 Thread Thomas Sachau
Alexandre Rostovtsev schrieb: Users know a package's natural name, not the occasionally cryptic ebuild name, and certainly not the category. If I want to install a game called Neverwinter Nights, it may not be immediately apparent to me that I should emerge something called games-rpg/nwn.

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application name) to packages. Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to LibreOffice Writer in package metadata. How about expanding metadata.xml (adding to its

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application name) to packages. Say, they bind libreoffice-writer to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Fabio Erculiani
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Application name in metadata.xml

2012-02-11 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/02/12 08:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani lx...@gentoo.org wrote: I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly