W dniu wto, 23.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶44 +0100, użytkownik Thomas
Deutschmann napisał:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-01-23 12:46, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look:
> > >
> > > https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html
> > >
> >
> > I've updated
Hi,
On 2018-01-23 12:46, Michał Górny wrote:
>> I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look:
>>
>> https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html
>>
>
> I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by Dirkjan.
> All arches are order according to the popularity
W dniu wto, 23.01.2018 o godzinie 13∶23 +0100, użytkownik Fabian Groffen
napisał:
> On 23-01-2018 12:49:00 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny <[1]mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by
> Dirkjan. All arches are order according to the popularity (based on
> the results from his mail), except Prefix which I left at the bottom
> as a special case.
Whether you will have
On 23-01-2018 12:49:00 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny <[1]mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
> > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm not
> > sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two lists
> > in
On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 12:49 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm
> > not
> > sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two
> > lists
>
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Since neither of the proposals has received any specific reply, I'm not
> sure how to proceed from here. I suppose we can possibly have two lists
> in different order so that people could use whichever they prefer.
>
Not
W dniu pon, 15.01.2018 o godzinie 23∶01 +0100, użytkownik Michał Górny
napisał:
> I've created a small HTML file with example of how this would look:
>
> https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/cc.html
>
I've updated the example to include the variant suggested by Dirkjan.
All arches are order
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:19 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> I disagree. I think most of the developers are used to the lexical sort,
> and it keeps the order predictable. While I suppose keeping amd64
> and x86 alongside for the sake of being commonly used would make sense,
> I
W dniu wto, 16.01.2018 o godzinie 10∶15 +0100, użytkownik Dirkjan
Ochtman napisał:
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Besides regrouping, I've also reordered the keywords to use the same
> > sorting order as eshowkw (i.e. ppc before ppc64), moved
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 11:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Besides regrouping, I've also reordered the keywords to use the same
> sorting order as eshowkw (i.e. ppc before ppc64), moved 'BSD' into teams
(in contrast to 'AMD64 FBSD' and 'X86 FBSD'), and added 'Prefix' team.
>
I
Hi, everyone.
Just a quick idea of reordering / regrouping the arch list on Bugzilla.
Currently the list is split into 'stable' and 'unstable' arches which is
not very precise, and do not exactly match what arch teams are doing.
For that reason, I'd like to use three groups instead:
a. stable
12 matches
Mail list logo