On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 05:47 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:46:15 +0100
> "Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't a Erlang project be better, specially as there is the Perl and
> > Python projects which are there for probably the same reasons?
>
> I think a
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:46:15 +0100
"Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" wrote:
> Wouldn't a Erlang project be better, specially as there is the Perl and
> Python projects which are there for probably the same reasons?
I think a "jabber" project would be a more suitable fit for this than
"erlang".
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:46:15 +0100
"Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" wrote:
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Ejabberd
>
> Wouldn't a Erlang project be better, specially as there is the Perl
> and Python projects which are there for probably the same reasons?
An erlang project would create
[2019-10-28 11:12:49+0100] Hanno Böck:
> There are a bunch of dev-erlang/* packages whose primary reason for
> packagin is that they're dependencies of ejabberd (and they're becoming
> more), most of them currently in maintainer-needed status.
>
> I'd like to group those together as maintained by
Hi,
I'm currently working on getting ejabberd up to date in Gentoo.
There are a bunch of dev-erlang/* packages whose primary reason for
packagin is that they're dependencies of ejabberd (and they're becoming
more), most of them currently in maintainer-needed status.
I'd like to group those
