Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-12 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:42:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: perl_ldap is feature-ful but hard to use. The bind options are confusing (user / recruiters / infra) do I bind as myself? As anon? Do I specify -b user or -b antarus? Mutli-valued attributes are confusing for users. We should

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Saturday 12 June 2010 23:22:09 Brian Harring wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:42:10PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: perl_ldap is feature-ful but hard to use. The bind options are confusing (user / recruiters / infra) do I bind as myself? As anon? Do I specify -b user or -b antarus?

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: On Friday 11 June 2010 06:27:26 Robin H. Johnson wrote: Related to integration of that, I would like opinions on moving some data from developer home directories into LDAP. I already placed the SPF data straight

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 6/11/10 5:27 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: - Ability to split woodpecker/dev.g.o up, and have an EU dev machine, and a US dev machine. (If mail isn't being forwarded outside of our systems, you would put in ${userna...@eu.dev.gentoo.org. Sounds good to me. Looks like it would have lower

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 08:58, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: Cons: - developers get changes to LDAP wrong already.       = I counter that they ALSO change the wrong filenames and wonder why         there is no effect. I counted a large number of '.permissave',        

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to use a web interface? phpldapadmin or something The problem with phpldapadmin is that it potentially opens up LDAP to the world. Require everybody to forward connection

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Friday 11 of June 2010 09:24:45 Peter Volkov wrote: В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to use a web interface? phpldapadmin or something The problem with phpldapadmin is that it potentially opens up

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 11/06/2010 в 09:48 +0200, Maciej Mrozowski пишет: On Friday 11 of June 2010 09:24:45 Peter Volkov wrote: В Чтв, 10/06/2010 в 23:42 -0700, Alec Warner пишет: I don't agree with that, but just out of curiosity, is it possible to use a web interface? phpldapadmin or something

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Petteri Räty
On 11.6.2010 6.27, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: Currently, we only need to set a proper message in ~/.away (as talked in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml ) when becoming devaway. Related to integration of that,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Thilo Bangert
This thread belongs to gentoo-project. perhaps its time to reduce the number of mailinglists again. IMHO it doesnt hurt to have this thread on gentoo-dev and the volume of messages and their tone here has been sufficiently normal to again allow for more subjects. just my 2 cents kind regards

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Friday 11 June 2010 10:48:36 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: I'm all for moving to LDAP every info that fits and it's possible. Maybe even things like Gentoo overlays access. That's not possible, as it is not an attribute that the developer himself should touch, but the overlays team only.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-11 Thread Petteri Räty
On 11.6.2010 12.32, Thilo Bangert wrote: This thread belongs to gentoo-project. perhaps its time to reduce the number of mailinglists again. IMHO it doesnt hurt to have this thread on gentoo-dev and the volume of messages and their tone here has been sufficiently normal to again allow for

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-10 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:07:53PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: Currently, we only need to set a proper message in ~/.away (as talked in http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml ) when becoming devaway. Related to integration of that, I would like opinions on moving some data

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Moving more developer data to LDAP, for scalability/redundancy (away, foward, permissive, SMTP password, plan) [WAS: Suggestion to ask devs to change their bugzilla name]

2010-06-10 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Friday 11 June 2010 06:27:26 Robin H. Johnson wrote: Related to integration of that, I would like opinions on moving some data from developer home directories into LDAP. I already placed the SPF data straight into LDAP, since I needed to be able to reach it from another machine anyway.