On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 6:06 AM Florian Schmaus wrote:
>
>
> This is a first suggestion in an effort to reach a compromise that
> allows EGO_SUM to be un-depracted.
>
> I have decided to check the size of A, instead of counting the entries
> in EGO_SUM, because that seemed more sensible given that
This is a first suggestion in an effort to reach a compromise that
allows EGO_SUM to be un-depracted.
I have decided to check the size of A, instead of counting the entries
in EGO_SUM, because that seemed more sensible given that as A's size
caused functional issues in the past (bug #719202 [1])