Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: gles global USE flag, USE=opengl clarifying

2018-07-24 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 17:43:59 -0700 Matt Turner wrote: > > Initially I thought of a global USE=gles2, but during the writing of > > this e-mail, I realized that as USE=opengl doesn't specify a version > > either (e.g. 3.3 or 4.5), so combined with gles3 not really needing > > a separate handling,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: gles global USE flag, USE=opengl clarifying

2018-07-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Hello, > > Currently we have rather a mess in terms of OpenGL API handling. > I think much of it comes from USE=opengl being rather vague - is it > supposed to mean "Use desktop GL", "Use GLX", or "Enable OpenGL > support". All of these

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: gles global USE flag, USE=opengl clarifying

2018-07-23 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Mon, 23 Jul 2018 20:11:37 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Currently we have rather a mess in terms of OpenGL API handling. > ... > Guidelines: > ... Thanks for discussing this with me earlier even though I don't feel I have a large say in the matter. Having faced this mess on ARM, it can be a

[gentoo-dev] RFC: gles global USE flag, USE=opengl clarifying

2018-07-23 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Hello, Currently we have rather a mess in terms of OpenGL API handling. I think much of it comes from USE=opengl being rather vague - is it supposed to mean "Use desktop GL", "Use GLX", or "Enable OpenGL support". All of these mean quite different things: * desktop GL means full OpenGL API, which