[gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm
Dear All, I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well. it was masked on Apr 18, 2010, , | /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask | 31-# Raúl Porcel armi...@gentoo.org | 32-# Fails to build/work | 33-openexr | 34:ocamlopt ` Debian has arm port for ocamlopt since 3.12: http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=nameskeywords=ocaml-native-compilers I failed to find the changelog of ocaml, though :( How about unmasking it now? Yours, Benda
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:14 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: Dear All, I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well. it was masked on Apr 18, 2010, , | /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask | 31-# Raúl Porcel armi...@gentoo.org | 32-# Fails to build/work | 33-openexr | 34:ocamlopt ` Debian has arm port for ocamlopt since 3.12: http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=nameskeywords=ocaml-native-compilers I failed to find the changelog of ocaml, though :( How about unmasking it now? Yours, Benda Related: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=340607
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm
On Wednesday 18 April 2012 22:14:54 hero...@gentoo.org wrote: How about unmasking it now? file a bug for the arm team to request keywordings. we'll probably say yes. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.