This outcome was just super. Systemd was bumped to -188 today. Udev is
still at -187. Instead of actually listening to upstream[1], which
would be easy with a virtual, we're now stuck with one part of the duo
being at one version and the other part of the duo another. And when I
login to X with
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:11:18 +0200
Peter Alfredsen peter.alfred...@gmail.com wrote:
This outcome was just super. Systemd was bumped to -188 today. Udev is
still at -187. Instead of actually listening to upstream[1], which
would be easy with a virtual, we're now stuck with one part of the duo
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 20:11:18 +0200
Peter Alfredsen peter.alfred...@gmail.com wrote:
This outcome was just super. Systemd was bumped to -188 today. Udev is
still at -187. Instead of actually listening to upstream[1], which
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:24:27 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:24:27 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:33:10 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:24:27 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:33:10 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 14:24:27 -0500
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:27:41 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally, I think a consolidated systemd/udev package is the best
way to go here.
A consolidated package means that:
- every change made by
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Peter Alfredsen
peter.alfred...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:27:41 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally, I think a consolidated systemd/udev package is the
Il 11/07/2012 22:33, Mike Gilbert ha scritto:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:54 PM, William Hubbswilli...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:27:41PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Just to put a number to this, there are currently 126 packages in the
tree with a dependency on sys-fs/udev.
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 12:51:50 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11 July 2012 03:23, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał Górny schrieb:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and
On 07/10/2012 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
An alternative would be to provide separate virtual/libudev
and virtual/libgudev; and maybe changing ebuilds not to depend on
[hwids] but rather pull in sys-apps/hwids directly (since that's what
the flag does).
USE=hwdb should be reviewed:
udev-180
On 07/10/2012 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story short, I would like to introduce a virtual for libudev
which would pull in either of those
Il 11/07/2012 10:03, Samuli Suominen ha scritto:
so knowing all that, I would simply kill USE=hwdb and always pull in the
package, as it used to be for avoiding pulling in the actual
pciutils/usbutils with their dependencies, but is not worth for the
separate hwids package anymore
Sounds
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:31:03 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 07/10/2012 06:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:23:39 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał Górny schrieb:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story short, I would like to
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 10:35:32 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:23:39 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
As discussed on IRC, there is still no consensus for installing the
Michał Górny schrieb:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:23:39 +0200
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał Górny schrieb:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story short, I
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:27:41PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Just to put a number to this, there are currently 126 packages in the
tree with a dependency on sys-fs/udev.
Personally, I think a consolidated systemd/udev package is the best
way to go here. Short of that, the virtual + blockers
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:54 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:27:41PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
Just to put a number to this, there are currently 126 packages in the
tree with a dependency on sys-fs/udev.
Personally, I think a consolidated systemd/udev
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 04:33:44PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 3:54 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thinking on this, I agree with Mike here, and to make it easier for
maintainers so they don't have to change their dependencies, it should
be a udev ebuild
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 15:27:41 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Personally, I think a consolidated systemd/udev package is the best
way to go here.
A consolidated package means that:
- every change made by udev developers would have to be reviewed by
systemd team to make sure it
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story short, I would like to introduce a virtual for libudev
which would pull in either of those two.
There are three USE flags used in
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:18:00 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag,
and the third was unconditional.
since udev-171 seems to be going stable, why not simply drop the
'extras' compatibility ?
then you could just use 'gudev?'
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:54:31 -0400
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:18:00 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag,
and the third was unconditional.
since udev-171 seems to be going stable,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:57:50PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 12:54:31 -0400
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:18:00 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
The former two were previously provided by 'extras' USE flag,
and the
Michał Górny schrieb:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story short, I would like to introduce a virtual for libudev
which would pull in either of those two.
There are
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 05:18:00PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story short, I would like to introduce a virtual for libudev
which would
On 11 July 2012 03:23, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał Górny schrieb:
Hello, all.
Since nowadays udev is bundled within systemd, we start having two
libudev providers: =sys-apps/systemd-185 and sys-fs/udev. Making
the long story short, I would like to introduce a virtual for
29 matches
Mail list logo
