[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Die if epunt_cxx is called unnecessarily.

2013-01-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:36:53 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Currently, epunt_cxx always succeeds. This results in some of the ebuilds keeping its use even though the C++ checks were removed upstream. Therefore, I'm suggesting to add a simple check to the function -- if none of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Die if epunt_cxx is called unnecessarily.

2013-01-30 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:57:20 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:36:53 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Currently, epunt_cxx always succeeds. This results in some of the ebuilds keeping its use even though the C++ checks were removed upstream.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH eutils] Die if epunt_cxx is called unnecessarily.

2013-01-30 Thread Ryan Hill
On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:53:06 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:57:20 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 22:36:53 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Currently, epunt_cxx always succeeds. This results in some of