Petteri Räty wrote:
> Actually bluetooth support is in quite a good shape. The thing was there
> was a urgent need to get bluez-utils-3* stable for which I need some doc
> updates etc before it can go stable. (Yes I am a slacker there)
Doc updates? GDP hasn't heard anything about this, as far as
Chris Gianelloni kirjoitti:
Understandable, bluetooth isn't the most mature thing in Linux. It
tends to either work or it doesn't.
Actually bluetooth support is in quite a good shape. The thing was there
was a urgent need to get bluez-utils-3* stable for which I need some doc
updates etc b
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 09:45 +0100, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > If adding "bluetooth" seems to be a bit much, how about just the "usb"
> > USE flag? After all, my UPS won't work with apcupsd without USE="usb"
> > on my server... ;]
>
> I don't know how
Hi,
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> If adding "bluetooth" seems to be a bit much, how about just the "usb"
> USE flag? After all, my UPS won't work with apcupsd without USE="usb"
> on my server... ;]
I don't know how badly needed bluetooth is (no need here), but I
remember we had to mas
