[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Duncan
Michael Orlitzky posted on Sat, 01 Dec 2012 22:44:36 -0500 as excerpted: On 12/01/2012 09:48 PM, Duncan wrote: So yes, a news item is reasonable as it's arguably part of that good documentation. But in general, there's something wrong if we're unduly worrying about loss of functionality

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Duncan schrieb: However, hasn't it always been gentoo policy to *STRONGLY* encourage users to run emerge --pretend/--ask and EXAMINE THE RESULTS for anything unexpected, and resolve it in one way or another to expected, before going ahead? Thus, anyone suddenly losing their openldap

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/02/2012 04:40 AM, Duncan wrote: As others have mentioned, equery u[ses] openldap . Does nothing in this case. Actually, I have a bug open at this very moment about a new ambiguous USE flag, USE=fma, in the new sci-libs/fftw-3.3.3 ebuild. My bdver1 has fma4, but not fma3. Does

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 02/12/2012 08:02, Michael Orlitzky wrote: I think you have Stockholm syndrome. I've updated thousands of packages this month. I cannot do this for each one, and even if I could, there's a huge (unnecessary) opportunity cost to doing so. Sorry but there is no way you could have updated

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/02/2012 11:19 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 02/12/2012 08:02, Michael Orlitzky wrote: I think you have Stockholm syndrome. I've updated thousands of packages this month. I cannot do this for each one, and even if I could, there's a huge (unnecessary) opportunity cost to doing so.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/12/12 11:50 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: $ cat /usr/portage/net-nds/openldap/metadata.xml euse -i 'minimal' |grep openldap :) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Peter Stuge
Alec Warner wrote: Testing all the updates is basically not possible. Understanding the updates is basically not possible. I think it's very possible to understand updates which are important for the system. Of course it is a lot of work if it is to be done every day. I would not update

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Pacho Ramos
El dom, 02-12-2012 a las 11:54 -0500, Michael Orlitzky escribió: [...] The USE=server solution is fine with me; the whole openldap thing was really tangential to the point I was trying to make. And for some reason it's not as fun to argue in the morning as it is at 2am, so thanks for working

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Duncan
Michael Orlitzky posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:02:09 -0500 as excerpted: On 12/02/2012 04:40 AM, Duncan wrote: As others have mentioned, equery u[ses] openldap . Does nothing in this case. It gives the global description, which as I said elsewhere, for a flag that's as critical as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-02 Thread Rich Freeman
Lots of people wrote: Various good points. Keep in mind that Gentoo users, even sysadmins, aren't expected to read -dev. That means that when things like profile changes happen they have no idea why, or what the impact will be. That's why we have news. It seems like we put out all of about 3

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Duncan
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:28:26 +0100 as excerpted: If this change is applied anyway, I suggest to at least produce a news item in order to not surprise users about the sudden loss of their openldap server. I wouldn't object to a news item. More information

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/01/2012 09:48 PM, Duncan wrote: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:28:26 +0100 as excerpted: If this change is applied anyway, I suggest to at least produce a news item in order to not surprise users about the sudden loss of their openldap server. I wouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 01/12/2012 19:44, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Someone's going to reboot three months after this change and their whole office is going to be down while they try to figure out why they don't have an LDAP server. For even a small business, that could mean thousands of dollars. Ha ha, you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/01/2012 10:50 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 01/12/2012 19:44, Michael Orlitzky wrote: Someone's going to reboot three months after this change and their whole office is going to be down while they try to figure out why they don't have an LDAP server. For even a small business, that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 01/12/2012 20:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote: The only way to know what's going on is to read the ebuild. And nobody has the time to do that for every default USE flag change, especially when you're managing multiple machines. In this case, USE=-minimal is really USE=make_it_work_at_all, for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Dustin C. Hatch
On 12/1/2012 22:21, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: If anything, what you just say would call for making openldap follow the 39 packages already out there using IUSE=+server, so that there is no doubt that changing the default on desktop profile from USE=-minimal to USE=-server means that _you're

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/01/2012 11:21 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: On 01/12/2012 20:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote: The only way to know what's going on is to read the ebuild. And nobody has the time to do that for every default USE flag change, especially when you're managing multiple machines. In this case,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 01/12/2012 20:50, Michael Orlitzky wrote: And most people don't even know that metadata.xml exists. But I do expect them to know `equery uses` like Dustin said. The fact that some flags are not clearly described in metadata.xml is another problem. In my previous message, I said, but you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Michael Orlitzky wrote: I just get annoyed with the don't use Gentoo unless you like your stuff broken attitude. Don't confuse stuff changing with stuff breaking - they are very different things. In Gentoo stuff changes every single day. I heard that gentoo-x86 gets some number of commits per

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Dale
Peter Stuge wrote: Michael Orlitzky wrote: I just get annoyed with the don't use Gentoo unless you like your stuff broken attitude. Don't confuse stuff changing with stuff breaking - they are very different things. In Gentoo stuff changes every single day. I heard that gentoo-x86 gets some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Dale
Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/01/2012 09:48 PM, Duncan wrote: Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn posted on Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:28:26 +0100 as excerpted: If this change is applied anyway, I suggest to at least produce a news item in order to not surprise users about the sudden loss of their

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Defaulting desktop profiles to net-nds/openldap[minimal]

2012-12-01 Thread Alec Warner
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:27 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Michael Orlitzky wrote: I just get annoyed with the don't use Gentoo unless you like your stuff broken attitude. Don't confuse stuff changing with stuff breaking - they are very different things. In Gentoo stuff changes