Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-24 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:33 AM, Nuno Silva wrote: > On 2017-05-24, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On śro, 2017-05-24 at 03:48 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: >>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:41:25AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote > [...] >>> Note where I said "...posted on Gentoo-User for comment...". What I'm

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-24 Thread nunojsilva
On 2017-05-24, Michał Górny wrote: > On śro, 2017-05-24 at 03:48 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: >> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:41:25AM +0200, Micha?? Górny wrote [...] >> Note where I said "...posted on Gentoo-User for comment...". What I'm >> asking is for such proposed changes to be posted on Gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-24 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 24 May 2017 14:21:13 +0900 Benda Xu wrote: > 2. Useful discussion are diluted from 1 list into 2 lists. I think dilution is the point, but the problem is not useful discussions. Its the useless ones that are targeted for dilution, so that the useful ones can stop drowning in them. pgp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-23 Thread Michał Górny
On śro, 2017-05-24 at 14:21 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: > Hi Michał, > > > Name: gentoo-dev-internal > > > > Topic: technical discussions between active Gentoo contributors > > Basically I object to this proposal. > > 1. Another layer of hierarchy is not desirable for a non-profit >organizatio

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-23 Thread Benda Xu
Hi Michał, > Name: gentoo-dev-internal > > Topic: technical discussions between active Gentoo contributors Basically I object to this proposal. 1. Another layer of hierarchy is not desirable for a non-profit organization like us. 2. Useful discussion are diluted from 1 list into 2 lists.