[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/25/2016 02:50 AM, Göktürk Yüksek wrote: > Ian Delaney: > >> 5. At the risk of sounding like Patrick, gentoo lacks some forms >> of documentation pertaining to established proxy maintainers and to >> forms of stats analysis. In discussions, points were raised >> regarding the gathering of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread Ian Delaney
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:21 -0500 Göktürk Yüksek wrote: > Duncan: > > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted: > > > [...] > > > > That gave me the idea of a maintainer-needed eclass. When packages > > are set to maintainer-needed, they

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:04:56 +0800 Ian Delaney wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:21 -0500 > Göktürk Yüksek wrote: > > > Duncan: > > > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted: > > > > > [...] > > > > > > That gave me the idea of a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-23 Thread waltdnes
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:54:01PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote > Please make this optional. Elog already contains too much information > and it is already hard to read logs after world update or other > massive change. It literally takes hours sometimes. Agreed 100%. I filed a successfull

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-19 Thread Göktürk Yüksek
Duncan: > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted: > >> "adopt-a-package" type program. In functionality, this is no different >> than proxy-maintenance, however, this codifies it into an explicit >> policy whereby users are encouraged to step and take over a package.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFD] Adopt-a-package, proxy-maintenance, and other musings

2016-01-18 Thread Duncan
NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted: > "adopt-a-package" type program. In functionality, this is no different > than proxy-maintenance, however, this codifies it into an explicit > policy whereby users are encouraged to step and take over a package. > This