On 01/25/2016 02:50 AM, Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> Ian Delaney:
>
>> 5. At the risk of sounding like Patrick, gentoo lacks some forms
>> of documentation pertaining to established proxy maintainers and to
>> forms of stats analysis. In discussions, points were raised
>> regarding the gathering of
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:21 -0500
Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> Duncan:
> > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > That gave me the idea of a maintainer-needed eclass. When packages
> > are set to maintainer-needed, they
On Sat, 23 Jan 2016 21:04:56 +0800 Ian Delaney wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 22:02:21 -0500
> Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
>
> > Duncan:
> > > NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted:
> > >
> > [...]
> > >
> > > That gave me the idea of a
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:54:01PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote
> Please make this optional. Elog already contains too much information
> and it is already hard to read logs after world update or other
> massive change. It literally takes hours sometimes.
Agreed 100%. I filed a successfull
Duncan:
> NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> "adopt-a-package" type program. In functionality, this is no different
>> than proxy-maintenance, however, this codifies it into an explicit
>> policy whereby users are encouraged to step and take over a package.
NP-Hardass posted on Tue, 19 Jan 2016 00:44:49 -0500 as excerpted:
> "adopt-a-package" type program. In functionality, this is no different
> than proxy-maintenance, however, this codifies it into an explicit
> policy whereby users are encouraged to step and take over a package.
> This