On Sunday 08 of November 2009 23:19:13 Mike Frysinger wrote:
So, you didn't get my point. It must be true then, what they say about
geeks and social skills...
i dont think your point is relevant to this thread
-mike
Indeed it is - it's not about what's been said, but about the way it's
On Monday 09 November 2009 07:36:31 Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Sunday 08 of November 2009 23:19:13 Mike Frysinger wrote:
So, you didn't get my point. It must be true then, what they say about
geeks and social skills...
i dont think your point is relevant to this thread
Indeed it is
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:36:00 Richard Freeman wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
#SRC_URI=mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz
# starting to hate sf.net ...
SRC_URI=http://foremost.sourceforge.net/pkg/foremost-1.5.6.tar.gz;
The filename that violates our policies hasn't changed between
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
Log:
Bump
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/foremost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
Index: foremost-1.5.6.ebuild
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
Log:
Bump
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/fo
remost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
Log:
Bump
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/fo
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:56:24 Petteri Räty wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
Log:
Bump
file :
On 08-11-2009 16:06:58 +0100, Patrick Lauer wrote:
So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and
just fix it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long
+1
walk on the beach and don't return for quite some time. At least I'm
trying to keep these packages
Patrick Lauer wrote:
So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix
it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long walk on the
beach
and doesn't return for quite some time. At least I'm trying to keep these
packages alive, which noone else
On Sunday 08 November 2009 10:06:58 Patrick Lauer wrote:
So I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just
fix it instead of whining at me until my motivation takes a long walk on
the beach and doesn't return for quite some time. At least I'm trying to
keep these
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Patrick Lauer wrote:
At least I'm trying to keep these
packages alive, which noone else seems to do.
If you spot that a new version is available, you're more than welcome to
post a version bump bug assigned to the appropriate herd and developer
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix
it instead
Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your
responsibility? Sorry but it's your job.
Also it's nice to see how
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix
it instead
Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your
On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just
fix it instead
Do
On Sunday 08 November 2009 19:24:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate if y'all stopped
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org said:
If you feel you have too much time you could search on bugzilla for patch
and start fixing those bugs. Bump is also a funny search.
If you are just bumping random packages and applying patches when you
have no idea how the package works, we have a
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just
fix it
On Sunday 08 November 2009 20:27:23 Mark Loeser wrote:
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org said:
If you feel you have too much time you could search on bugzilla for
patch and start fixing those bugs. Bump is also a funny search.
If you are just bumping random packages and applying patches
2009/11/8 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org:
Also, please learn how to communicate in a manner that is constructive
instead of acting like a dick at every opportunity.
Looks to me this should be applied to some others in this thread first.
Really, aren't there more constructive ways to communicate
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org said:
2009/11/8 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org:
Also, please learn how to communicate in a manner that is constructive
instead of acting like a dick at every opportunity.
Looks to me this should be applied to some others in this thread first.
Really, aren't
2009/11/8 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org:
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org said:
Really, aren't there more constructive ways to communicate your (meaning
all of you in this thread) concerns, without demotivating the person who
does so much work for Gentoo?
If the person doing said work does
On Sunday 08 November 2009 14:46:34 Thomas Sachau wrote:
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:22:19 Ben de Groot wrote:
2009/11/8 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org:
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org said:
Really, aren't there more constructive ways to communicate your (meaning
all of you in this thread) concerns, without demotivating the person who
does so
none of your points here are relevant to the original issue at hand. like
Mark said, if you cant be bothered to do it right in the first place, then
dont do it at all. if that means packages get removed from the tree, then so
be it. it isnt that hard to do it right in the first place, so
Petteri Räty wrote:
#SRC_URI=mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}.tar.gz
# starting to hate sf.net ...
SRC_URI=http://foremost.sourceforge.net/pkg/foremost-1.5.6.tar.gz;
The filename that violates our policies hasn't changed between the new
and old SRC_URI.
Is this policy actually written down
Ben de Groot wrote:
2009/11/8 Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org:
Also, please learn how to communicate in a manner that is constructive
instead of acting like a dick at every opportunity.
Looks to me this should be applied to some others in this thread first.
Really, aren't there more
26 matches
Mail list logo