[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: toolchain-funcs.eclass

2009-04-05 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org posted 200904042353.30988.vap...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:53:29 -0400: +local sources=$@ this doesnt do what you think it does. it's the same as $* which means this function does not handle quoted arguments properly. ?? I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: toolchain-funcs.eclass

2009-04-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 05 April 2009 03:49:52 Duncan wrote: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org posted + local sources=$@ this doesnt do what you think it does. it's the same as $* which means this function does not handle quoted arguments properly. ?? I'm confused. Maybe you meant something

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: toolchain-funcs.eclass

2009-04-05 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 04-04-2009 23:53:29 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 04 April 2009 13:17:56 Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote: grobian 09/04/04 17:17:56 Modified: toolchain-funcs.eclass Log: Add support for all Prefix arches, in particular for gen_usr_ld_script, and add

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: toolchain-funcs.eclass

2009-04-05 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org posted 200904050401.19301.vap...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 05 Apr 2009 04:01:18 -0400: what you've read/quoted matters at the expansion step, but that isnt what i'm talking about. i'm pointing out that the expansion is lost by assigning through the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: toolchain-funcs.eclass

2009-04-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 04 April 2009 13:17:56 Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote: grobian 09/04/04 17:17:56 Modified: toolchain-funcs.eclass Log: Add support for all Prefix arches, in particular for gen_usr_ld_script, and add AIX specific function, backport from Prefix you really