[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-11-01 Thread Duncan
Jeroen Roovers posted on Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:36:25 +0100 as excerpted: [Duncan wrote...] However, Gentoo policy has always been that even ~arch is only upstream- stable packages, the ~arch keyword denoting Gentoo package testing (basically, the ebuild script and dependencies), /not/ upstream

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-11-01 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 10:34:21 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Well, then, perhaps the developer handbook and devmanual versions make sense to you: Stop throwing the book at me, please. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-30 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Also speaking about this specific package: I've maintained this package quite long time and I'm following upstream mailing list and I've never heard from upstream it's safe to push betas on all users. I didn't push it on

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-30 Thread Duncan
Jeroen Roovers posted on Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:40:45 +0200 as excerpted: On Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:44:42 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Also speaking about this specific package: I've maintained this package quite long time and I'm following upstream mailing list and I've never heard

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 06:03 +, Jeroen Roovers (jer) пишет: jer 10/10/29 06:03:08 Modified: ChangeLog Added:tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild Log: Beta version bump, fixes buffer overflow (bug #336605). Please, hard mask beta versions. To fix this

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno ven, 29/10/2010 alle 12.12 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: Please, hard mask beta versions. To fix this bug it's not hard to backport patch (patch referenced in bug) and this will give us good version to stabilize. Really don't abuse beta versions. It vastly depends how beta the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 06:03 +, Jeroen Roovers (jer) пишет: jer 10/10/29 06:03:08 Modified: ChangeLog Added:tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild Log: Beta version bump, fixes

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Please, hard mask beta versions. I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version changed a lot which might imply a lot of users getting trouble due

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 07:29:07PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Please, hard mask beta versions. I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 19:29 +0200, Michał Górny пишет: On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 12:12:38 +0400 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote: Please, hard mask beta versions. I personally don't see a reason why he needed to do that. If a particular package was a popular one and/or the beta version changed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-analyzer/tcpreplay: ChangeLog tcpreplay-3.4.5_beta2.ebuild

2010-10-29 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 29/10/2010 в 17:51 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò пишет: Il giorno ven, 29/10/2010 alle 12.12 +0400, Peter Volkov ha scritto: Please, hard mask beta versions. To fix this bug it's not hard to backport patch (patch referenced in bug) and this will give us good version to stabilize.