Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in rox-base/rox-clib: ChangeLog rox-clib-2.1.10.ebuild

2007-12-08 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 10:16 Fri 07 Dec , Jim Ramsay wrote: > Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Instead of these subshells to save the original directory, a more > > common technique is pushd/popd. Another possibility is 'cd foo; > > stuff; cd -', but that doesn't stack. > > That's an excellent idea,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in rox-base/rox-clib: ChangeLog rox-clib-2.1.10.ebuild

2007-12-07 Thread Jim Ramsay
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Instead of these subshells to save the original directory, a more > common technique is pushd/popd. Another possibility is 'cd foo; > stuff; cd -', but that doesn't stack. That's an excellent idea, I'll update these to not use subshells in the future.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in rox-base/rox-clib: ChangeLog rox-clib-2.1.10.ebuild

2007-12-06 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 15:53 Thu 06 Dec , Jim Ramsay (lack) wrote: > 1.1 rox-base/rox-clib/rox-clib-2.1.10.ebuild > > file : > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/rox-base/rox-clib/rox-clib-2.1.10.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup > plain: > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/