[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-java/bcprov/

[Michał Górny]

Dnia 2015-10-08, o godz. 22:11:12
"Patrice Clement"  napisał(a):

> commit: 82be4dfc08bacbac9814583a840bb1d2fd59
> Author: Patrice Clement  gentoo  org>
> AuthorDate: Thu Oct  8 22:02:48 2015 +
> Commit: Patrice Clement  gentoo  org>
> CommitDate: Thu Oct  8 22:06:19 2015 +
> URL:https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=82be4dfc
> 
> dev-java/bcprov: Clean up old.
> 
> Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1
> Signed-off-by: Patrice Clement  gentoo.org>
> 
>  dev-java/bcprov/Manifest  |  3 --
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.38-r2.ebuild | 57 
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.38-r3.ebuild | 57 
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.40-r1.ebuild | 59 
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.45-r1.ebuild | 59 
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.45.ebuild| 59 
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.48-r1.ebuild | 64 --
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.49-r2.ebuild | 81 -
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.49-r3.ebuild | 81 -
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.50-r1.ebuild | 58 
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.50.ebuild| 81 -
>  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.52.ebuild| 84 
> ---
>  12 files changed, 743 deletions(-)

Replying to one of the particularly influential commits in long batch
of wrongdoing.

So here you remove all of the ebuild which have SLOT="0", effectively
breaking *stable* dev-java/bcmail, dev-java/bcpkix, dev-java/itext:

https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l59
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l153
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l249
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l343
https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l710

What's even worse, you instantly stabilize new dev-java/bcmail ebuilds
which have the same issue.

As a side issue, why the hell do you stabilize a number of random old
versions? This does not like a sane solution, instantly adding dozen
of poorly-tested middle versions into the stable tree.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny



pgpOnbWIVggMa.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-java/bcprov/

[Patrice Clement]

Friday 09 Oct 2015 08:28:06, Michał Górny wrote :
> Dnia 2015-10-08, o godz. 22:11:12
> "Patrice Clement"  napisał(a):
> 
> > commit: 82be4dfc08bacbac9814583a840bb1d2fd59
> > Author: Patrice Clement  gentoo  org>
> > AuthorDate: Thu Oct  8 22:02:48 2015 +
> > Commit: Patrice Clement  gentoo  org>
> > CommitDate: Thu Oct  8 22:06:19 2015 +
> > URL:https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=82be4dfc
> > 
> > dev-java/bcprov: Clean up old.
> > 
> > Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1
> > Signed-off-by: Patrice Clement  gentoo.org>
> > 
> >  dev-java/bcprov/Manifest  |  3 --
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.38-r2.ebuild | 57 
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.38-r3.ebuild | 57 
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.40-r1.ebuild | 59 
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.45-r1.ebuild | 59 
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.45.ebuild| 59 
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.48-r1.ebuild | 64 --
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.49-r2.ebuild | 81 
> > -
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.49-r3.ebuild | 81 
> > -
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.50-r1.ebuild | 58 
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.50.ebuild| 81 
> > -
> >  dev-java/bcprov/bcprov-1.52.ebuild| 84 
> > ---
> >  12 files changed, 743 deletions(-)
> 
> Replying to one of the particularly influential commits in long batch
> of wrongdoing.
> 
> So here you remove all of the ebuild which have SLOT="0", effectively
> breaking *stable* dev-java/bcmail, dev-java/bcpkix, dev-java/itext:
> 
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l59
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l153
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l249
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l343
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/62d6c0c/6.html#l710
> 
> What's even worse, you instantly stabilize new dev-java/bcmail ebuilds
> which have the same issue.
> 
> As a side issue, why the hell do you stabilize a number of random old
> versions? This does not like a sane solution, instantly adding dozen
> of poorly-tested middle versions into the stable tree.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Michał Górny
> 

bcprov ebuilds were a clusterfuck that I was trying to fix and obviously I
failed. Taking a look at it right now. Fix underway.

-- 
Patrice Clement
Gentoo Linux developer
http://www.gentoo.org


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature