On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 15:26 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > First off, I'd like to apologize for cross-posting this, but I've been > pestered by this enough recently to want to try to reach as much of the > developer pool as possible. > > If you add any amd64 KEYWORDS to *any* packages in the tree, make sure > you've updated your profiles directory before doing your repoman scan. > The profiles.desc file now lists default-linux/amd64/2006.0/no-multilib > as a valid profile. This means if you're committing something that > requires 32-bit libraries, you *MUST* mask the package in > default-linux/amd64/2006.0/no-multilib/package.mask *before* doing your > commit. This is like the 10th time in the past few weeks that I've been > contacted directly to fix broken masks in other people's packages.
Everything Chris said but please don't overlook profiles/hardened/amd64 (our no-multilib) in addition to profiles/hardened/amd64/multilib (our multilib) The logic is a kinda inverted from what some of you may be used to when thinking of the how the default-linux profile deals with it, but we think it's proper the way we do it.. > It's pretty simple. If it uses ABI=x86 or any emul-linux-x86-* > packages, then it needs to be masked. > > Over and out. > -- Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Linux -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
