Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh

2014-12-21 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:39:20AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 03:15:48PM +0300, Сергей wrote: > >> Today two bugs from 504116's dependencies were resolved and two other > >> bugs were removed from 504116's depende

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh

2014-12-21 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 10:40 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 03:15:48PM +0300, Сергей wrote: >> Today two bugs from 504116's dependencies were resolved and two other >> bugs were removed from 504116's dependencies list. Thanks to >> maintainers who decided to solve the problem!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh

2014-12-21 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 03:15:48PM +0300, Сергей wrote: > Today two bugs from 504116's dependencies were resolved and two other > bugs were removed from 504116's dependencies list. Thanks to > maintainers who decided to solve the problem! The bugs being resolved is good, but I'm concerned about th

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug №504116, /etc/init.d/functions.sh

2014-12-20 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Сергей wrote: > I see. https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo-functions/pull/2 It is my pull > request. > Seems like these packages' maintainers are busy solving other problems now. > If this really gets in somebody's way they will just post a notice in the affected pa