Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/17/2010 10:07 AM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 8/16/10 5:29 PM, David Abbott wrote: >> I can but just want to make sure this is what everyone wants; >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/pr/where.xml >> I got that from http://dev.gentoo.org/~phajdan.jr/where.xml >> Looks fine to me I am ready to commit, just say so and its done. > > Looks good to me. Thanks! > OK Paweł, Everyone, done - -- David Abbott (dabbott) Gentoo Linux PR x86 openrc http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/ http://linuxcrazy.com/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxq3HIACgkQcZ+z4vAcSswQTwCcCFo8X1QNJ6eAozKBtbY/XQph VpEAn0ZEbLeq048XtPhXM4kjhSJ2Zobh =H0uw -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
On 8/16/10 5:29 PM, David Abbott wrote: > I can but just want to make sure this is what everyone wants; > http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/pr/where.xml > I got that from http://dev.gentoo.org/~phajdan.jr/where.xml > Looks fine to me I am ready to commit, just say so and its done. Looks good to me. Thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:24:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > I have access to main/en and I am willing to do website stuff; just > nothing with a quick turnaround. > > I know guidexml and enough xsl to be dangerous. Excellent. I've been the defacto www@ team for as long as I can remember. More help would be appreciated. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
I have access to main/en and I am willing to do website stuff; just nothing with a quick turnaround. I know guidexml and enough xsl to be dangerous. -A On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: > On 17 August 2010 02:43, Joshua Saddler wrote: >> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300 >> Markos Chandras wrote: >> >>> You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of >>> the >>> webpage like dosc or pr teams >> >> Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is directly >> responsible for those pages, though all three teams have provided input in >> the past. >> >> There's just me. >> >> I happen to be on all three teams, but none of those teams themselves are >> responsible for /main/ content. > > The team responsible for the main website is the now defunct www team. > > http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/contact.xml says "Maintaining Gentoo's > presence on the web is a daunting task. Gentoo has a dedicated team of > webmasters who keep our site looking sharp and up-to-date. If you have > a question or comment about any Gentoo web site, then this team is > what you are looking for. They can be contacted by sending an email to > w...@gentoo.org." > > But nobody seems worried about the fact that emails to that address > don't get answered. I was about to step in there, when I got sidelined > by Calchan. > > Cheers, > Ben > >
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
On 17 August 2010 02:43, Joshua Saddler wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300 > Markos Chandras wrote: > >> You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of >> the >> webpage like dosc or pr teams > > Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is directly > responsible for those pages, though all three teams have provided input in > the past. > > There's just me. > > I happen to be on all three teams, but none of those teams themselves are > responsible for /main/ content. The team responsible for the main website is the now defunct www team. http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/contact.xml says "Maintaining Gentoo's presence on the web is a daunting task. Gentoo has a dedicated team of webmasters who keep our site looking sharp and up-to-date. If you have a question or comment about any Gentoo web site, then this team is what you are looking for. They can be contacted by sending an email to w...@gentoo.org." But nobody seems worried about the fact that emails to that address don't get answered. I was about to step in there, when I got sidelined by Calchan. Cheers, Ben
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:11 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote: > On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0700 > Joshua Saddler wrote: >> That said, I've been looking at the proposed changes, so I'll be implementing >> some or all of them soon, probably today, time permitting. > > I'm not going to be able to get to this, so anyone else with commit access to > /main/en/ can feel free to make the changes. > I can but just want to make sure this is what everyone wants; http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/pr/where.xml I got that from http://dev.gentoo.org/~phajdan.jr/where.xml Looks fine to me I am ready to commit, just say so and its done. david -- David Abbott (dabbott) Gentoo http://dev.gentoo.org/~dabbott/
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 11:43:06 -0700 Joshua Saddler wrote: > That said, I've been looking at the proposed changes, so I'll be implementing > some or all of them soon, probably today, time permitting. I'm not going to be able to get to this, so anyone else with commit access to /main/en/ can feel free to make the changes. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:34:08 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of the > webpage like dosc or pr teams Common misconception. Neither the GDP, PR, or even Releng is directly responsible for those pages, though all three teams have provided input in the past. There's just me. I happen to be on all three teams, but none of those teams themselves are responsible for /main/ content. That said, I've been looking at the proposed changes, so I'll be implementing some or all of them soon, probably today, time permitting. signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 09:58:32PM -0700, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 8/8/10 6:22 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > I'd like to suggest a cleanup of our "Get Gentoo" page. It is one of the > > more important pages, because every new user has to visit it. > > > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~phajdan.jr/where.xml > > Okay, let's get some decisions on it. > > Joshua Saddler raised some concerns, and I asked what essential > information is missing from my suggested page that is on the current > page. In my opinion everything that should be there is still there, and > I only changed the order of things. > > Roy Bamford suggested we post more information about CPU families for > each arch to make the right choice easier. I think we can do that in > another cleanup pass (let's fix one issue at a time), and it would be > nice to get a more detailed suggestion (there are just so many x86 cpu > families). > > Sebastian Pipping and Markos Chandras liked the new page. > > So, how do we proceed? > You should talk directly to the teams how are responsible for this part of the webpage like dosc or pr teams -- Markos Chandras (hwoarang) Gentoo Linux Developer Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.org Key ID: 441AC410 Key FP: AAD0 8591 E3CD 445D 6411 3477 F7F7 1E8E 441A C410 pgpUBYtjl4Nnw.pgp Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Cleanup of the "Get Gentoo" page
On 8/8/10 6:22 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'd like to suggest a cleanup of our "Get Gentoo" page. It is one of the > more important pages, because every new user has to visit it. > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~phajdan.jr/where.xml Okay, let's get some decisions on it. Joshua Saddler raised some concerns, and I asked what essential information is missing from my suggested page that is on the current page. In my opinion everything that should be there is still there, and I only changed the order of things. Roy Bamford suggested we post more information about CPU families for each arch to make the right choice easier. I think we can do that in another cleanup pass (let's fix one issue at a time), and it would be nice to get a more detailed suggestion (there are just so many x86 cpu families). Sebastian Pipping and Markos Chandras liked the new page. So, how do we proceed? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
