On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
wrote:
> On 17/02/2013 23:04, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> >
>> We will use qt* instead of qt-*[1] to match the way upstream names the
>> modules. So that would be dev-qt/qtcore etc
>
> Thanks, and thanks for the link, as I wouldn't have known how
On 17/02/2013 23:04, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> >
> We will use qt* instead of qt-*[1] to match the way upstream names the
> modules. So that would be dev-qt/qtcore etc
Thanks, and thanks for the link, as I wouldn't have known how to rename
the deps myself otherwise...
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Fl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/17/2013 09:35 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 16/02/2013 13:08, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> Questions can be directed to our IRC channel #gentoo-qt or email
>> q...@gentoo.org
>
> So what's the final word on the move? dev-qt/core or dev-qt/qt-co
On 16/02/2013 13:08, Ben de Groot wrote:
> Questions can be directed to our IRC channel #gentoo-qt or email
> q...@gentoo.org
So what's the final word on the move?
dev-qt/core or dev-qt/qt-core ?
--
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/
signature.a
