Grant Goodyear wrote: [Mon Oct 23 2006, 09:50:02AM CDT]
> *Sigh* Unfortunately, the bylaws have yet to be approved (mainly
> because the quorum requirements would kill us). Thus, there is no
> well-defined path. The options are:
>
> (1) Follow the bylaws, and the remaining trustees will pick a
Stuart Herbert wrote: [Mon Oct 23 2006, 07:16:24AM CDT]
> On 10/23/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Anyone know where I can find a copy of the Foundation's by-laws, to
> >see what it says about this situation?
>
> Never mind, I found them [1]. Section 5.7 says that the remaining
>
On Mon, 2006-10-23 at 13:09 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On 10/23/06, Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear All (specifically, the voting members of the foundation),
> >
> > Thank you all so much for expressing your confidence in me with the most
> > recent Trustee elections. I fea
On 10/23/06, Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear All (specifically, the voting members of the foundation),
Thank you all so much for expressing your confidence in me with the most
recent Trustee elections. I fear, however, that for personal reasons I
will be unable to assume my posi
On 10/23/06, Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyone know where I can find a copy of the Foundation's by-laws, to
see what it says about this situation?
Never mind, I found them [1]. Section 5.7 says that the remaining
Trustees can vote in a replacement for Seemant. It doesn't requir
