On 12/15/2012 11:20 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> Gentoo isn't GitHub. When people donate money to Gentoo they're not
> donating so that a club of elite coders can use the infrastructure to
> host just anything that suits their fancy. The reason that we let any
> Gentoo developer just start a project
On 12/15/2012 05:20 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>>
>>
>> eudev is a Gentoo project is not Gentoo. Same could be said for OpenRC.
>>
>
> OpenRC isn't a Gentoo project, at least, it wasn't in the past.
>
> The social contract defines Gentoo as a
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Luca Barbato wrote:
>
>
> eudev is a Gentoo project is not Gentoo. Same could be said for OpenRC.
>
OpenRC isn't a Gentoo project, at least, it wasn't in the past.
The social contract defines Gentoo as a collection of free knowledge,
which includes "free softwar
On 12/15/2012 01:48 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>> The systemd developers were in the middle of a transition to the LGPL
>> from the GPL when we forked. We inherited the code in the middle of that
>> transition and we see no reason to purs
Rich Freeman posted on Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:48:29 -0500 as excerpted:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
>> The systemd developers were in the middle of a transition to
>> the LGPL
>> from the GPL when we forked. We inherited the code in the middle of
>> that tr
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
> The systemd developers were in the middle of a transition to the LGPL
> from the GPL when we forked. We inherited the code in the middle of that
> transition and we see no reason to pursue a different course. Therefore,
> all future ch
