Anthony G. Basile wrote:
>> Would it be at all possible to add the markings after/as files land
>> on the destination filesystem instead?
..
> since we sometimes have to do pax markings during src_compile() or
> src_test() or early during src_install() etc, the safest approach is to
> preserve xa
On 10/16/15 7:49 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
if you emerge when using a vanilla kernel or some other which doesn't
support user.pax.* on tmpfs, then you'll loose those markings.
Would it be at all possible to add the markings after/as files land
on the destination filesystem
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
> if you emerge when using a vanilla kernel or some other which doesn't
> support user.pax.* on tmpfs, then you'll loose those markings.
Would it be at all possible to add the markings after/as files land
on the destination filesystem instead?
It's not really intuitive th
On 10/16/15 3:14 AM, netfab wrote:
Le 15/10/15 à 15:11, Duncan a tapoté :
Is there a bug opened about this ?
If the gentoo kernel XATTR patch is really required, it would be great
if users who do not use a gentoo kernel were aware about this. Does
PAX_MARKINGS="none" in make.conf (see pax-utils.
Le 15/10/15 à 15:11, Duncan a tapoté :
> Having just completed an update and checked the warnings, which
> occurred on firefox and llvm, I can confirm that the paths mentioned
> in the warnings are in the tmpfs PORTAGE_TMPDIR, *not* on btrfs.
>
> And I run a mainline (direct git, in fact) kernel.
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 15 Oct 2015 08:36:59 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Alexander Tsoy
> wrote:
>>
>> I was wrong. This patch was not merged upstream. It is still needed and
>> included in latest genpatches for 4.2:
>>
>> $ tar tf genpatches-4.2-6.base.tar.xz | gre
Alexander Tsoy posted on Thu, 15 Oct 2015 14:09:29 +0300 as excerpted:
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:56:28 +0800 Jason Zaman
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 10:57:45AM +0200, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > On Wed, 14 Oct 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > > anyone opposed to flipping
On 10/15/15 6:32 AM, Duncan wrote:
Tobias Klausmann posted on Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:57:45 +0200 as excerpted:
By now the messages are just an annoyance/spam to me, but I suspect this
may be more of a problem for people who have lower pain thresholds.
That could have been my post... all the way d
Tobias Klausmann posted on Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:57:45 +0200 as excerpted:
> By now the messages are just an annoyance/spam to me, but I suspect this
> may be more of a problem for people who have lower pain thresholds.
That could have been my post... all the way down to and including the
annoyanc
