Alex Tarkovsky wrote:
On 4/13/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 21:16 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> I'm not implying there's anything wrong w/ restricting the bug; just
> that pointing users here to it won't get them very far. ;)
*I* didn't point anyone to that b
On 4/13/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 21:16 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> I'm not implying there's anything wrong w/ restricting the bug; just
> that pointing users here to it won't get them very far. ;)
*I* didn't point anyone to that bug, as I knew it was lo
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 21:16 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> I'm not implying there's anything wrong w/ restricting the bug; just
> that pointing users here to it won't get them very far. ;)
*I* didn't point anyone to that bug, as I knew it was locked and
wouldn't provide our users with much of anything
Chris Gianelloni napsal(a):
> On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 20:40 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156814
>> Yeah. It's restricted to developers only, though, so not much useful for
>> users. :)
>
> Yeah, I did that because we had users adding
On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 20:40 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
> > this seems to come up more often than you like. is this the release
> > tracker bug?
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156814
> >
> > kind regards
> > Thilo
>
>
> Yeah. It's restricted to developers only
Thilo Bangert napsal(a):
> this seems to come up more often than you like. is this the release
> tracker bug?
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156814
>
> kind regards
> Thilo
Yeah. It's restricted to developers only, though, so not much useful for
users. :)
--
Best regards,
Jakub M
Thilo Bangert wrote:
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I'm simply amazed at the level of complete and total bullshit that some
people spout off on this list without bothering to check facts or take
3 seconds to talk to the people in the know. If you don't know what
you're talking about
