Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: BROKEN: repository became broken!

2016-03-30 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:52:13 +0200
Patrick Lauer  wrote:

> On 03/30/2016 04:32 PM, mgo...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
> > Looks like someone just broke Gentoo!
> >
> > New issues:
> > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/33f062a/output.html#dev-db/aerospike-server-community
> >
> >
> > Introduced by commits:
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=54033c5
> >
> >
> > Changes since last check:
> > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/?qt=range&q=0d2b3ad..54033c5
> >
> > --
> > Gentoo repository CI  
> ... can you please either use repoman like everyone else, or fix
> repoman to match the behaviour you like?
> 
> 'cause it's annoying to have repoman say all is well and then get
> such a nice response. Hard to comply with rules if there's no good
> way to check the rules.
> 
> 

Yeah, it would be nice to have a final resolution to the
metadataDTD ==> xmlshema change so the repoman metadata module can get
a proper re-write.

In the meantime, repoman can not detect the recent change to the
maintainer field.

-- 
Brian Dolbec 




[gentoo-dev] Re: BROKEN: repository became broken!

2016-03-30 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 03/30/2016 04:32 PM, mgo...@bonedaddy.net wrote:
> Looks like someone just broke Gentoo!
>
> New issues:
> https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/33f062a/output.html#dev-db/aerospike-server-community
>
>
> Introduced by commits:
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=54033c5
>
>
> Changes since last check:
> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/?qt=range&q=0d2b3ad..54033c5
>
> --
> Gentoo repository CI
... can you please either use repoman like everyone else, or fix repoman
to match the behaviour you like?

'cause it's annoying to have repoman say all is well and then get such a
nice response. Hard to comply with rules if there's no good way to check
the rules.