On 05:16 Fri 02 Dec , Duncan wrote:
TL;DR: reiserfs (v3), for both caps and XT_PAX ??
A bit OT, but I find it incredibly ironic that perhaps the shortest
email you've ever written contained a TL;DR segment.
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Council Member / Sr. Developer
Gentoo Linux
On Friday 02 December 2011 00:16:43 Duncan wrote:
Longer: Does reiserfs (v3) support xattrs and thus, presumably caps and
XT_PAX? Kernel reiserfs options suggest yes, but everything I've read
elsewhere (including gentoo-dev caps project discussions) seems to
indicate no. Is the no simply
Donnie Berkholz posted on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 15:47:01 -0500 as excerpted:
On 05:16 Fri 02 Dec , Duncan wrote:
TL;DR: reiserfs (v3), for both caps and XT_PAX ??
A bit OT, but I find it incredibly ironic that perhaps the shortest
email you've ever written contained a TL;DR segment.
=;^)
On 12/07/2011 05:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2011 00:16:43 Duncan wrote:
Longer: Does reiserfs (v3) support xattrs and thus, presumably caps and
XT_PAX? Kernel reiserfs options suggest yes, but everything I've read
elsewhere (including gentoo-dev caps project
Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:10:01 -0500 as excerpted:
while i've never tested xattrs on reiserfs (as alluded earlier, i've
dropped all my reiserfs usage in favor of ext4), but i know tmpfs works
(once you've enabled it in the kernel).
Thanks.
FWIW:
(1) Tail-packing.
(2)
Anthony G. Basile posted on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:03:22 -0500 as excerpted:
I just tested with reiser3 and xattr works just fine. Just make sure
its enabled in the kernel and when you mount the fs use option
user_xattr for the user. namespace.
Thanks.
--
Duncan - List replies preferred. No
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 20:45:28 Duncan wrote:
(1) Tail-packing.
ext4 will be doing something similar:
http://lwn.net/Articles/469805/
although i don't find the overhead w/out tail packing to be a deal breaker
(3) The kernel folks don't screw with it as much as they do ext*.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i have no sympathy for broken userspace code
I define broken userspace code as anything that uses fsync except for
transactional synchronization with external sources.
My system is a bit beefier now, but one of the biggest
Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 20:58:15 -0500 as excerpted:
On Wednesday 07 December 2011 20:45:28 Duncan wrote:
(1) Tail-packing.
ext4 will be doing something similar: http://lwn.net/Articles/469805/
Thanks. I was ~3 months behind on LWN for awhile but am down to 4 weeks
Anthony G. Basile posted on Thu, 01 Dec 2011 11:08:37 -0500 as excerpted:
I've been doing some experimental work with PaX enabled kernels
The disadvantage is that xattrs is not supported on all filesystems
b) Kernels 3.0 and above support xattrs in tmpfs, squashfs and other
filesystems.
[I
10 matches
Mail list logo
