[gentoo-dev] Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-13 Thread Duncan
Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org posted eafa4c130903101013s3bb64404g9e65ca0fc8973...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:13:36 -0500: So really an effective solution might be for the recruiters/retirement staff to change a user's shell with a script that spits out a message

[gentoo-dev] Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-10 Thread Duncan
Gordon Malm gen...@gentoo.org posted 200903091617.48682.gen...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:17:48 -0700: There is an important security aspect to retiring folks - commit abilities. Perhaps in the case a dev wants to contribute but cannot in the near future their commit

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-10 Thread Pierre-Yves Rofes
On Tue, March 10, 2009 7:07 am, Duncan wrote: Gordon Malm gen...@gentoo.org posted 200903091617.48682.gen...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:17:48 -0700: There is an important security aspect to retiring folks - commit abilities. Perhaps in the case a dev wants to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-10 Thread Duncan
Pierre-Yves Rofes p...@gentoo.org posted a4345526fd26a2a6f5dd3cccb4e9767d.squir...@mail.rofes.fr, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:55 +0100: We don't want some still active authorization and key from two years ago getting stolen and used to try to slip a bad commit under the radar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-10 Thread Alec Warner
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 3:21 AM, Pierre-Yves Rofes p...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, March 10, 2009 7:07 am, Duncan wrote: Gordon Malm gen...@gentoo.org posted 200903091617.48682.gen...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Mon, 09 Mar 2009 16:17:48 -0700: There is an important security aspect to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-10 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Tuesday 10 of March 2009 16:29:56 Alec Warner wrote: With some devs reviewing gentoo-commits@, I highly doubt that this commit could go unnoticed more than a few hours. really? cause I bet I could slip something in; now I'm motivated to try ;p I somewhat share the view that's rather

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-10 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Pierre-Yves Rofes p...@gentoo.org posted a4345526fd26a2a6f5dd3cccb4e9767d.squir...@mail.rofes.fr, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:21:55 +0100: We don't want some still active authorization and key from two years

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Developer Retirements

2009-03-10 Thread Lukasz Damentko
2009/3/10 Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org: So really an effective solution might be for the recruiters/retirement staff to change a user's shell with a script that spits out a message that says something to the effect of: You have been inactive for a while. Please contact recruiters to