Il giorno mer, 14/09/2011 alle 12.38 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto:
Honestly, I'm ready to remove all relevant code in
autotools-utils.eclass and fix all ebuilds in gx86 Sunrise using it.
But if that's not the path we're going to take, I'd like to avoid
changing API then.
If that means
On 09/14/2011 02:06 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno mer, 14/09/2011 alle 12.38 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto:
Honestly, I'm ready to remove all relevant code in
autotools-utils.eclass and fix all ebuilds in gx86 Sunrise using it.
But if that's not the path we're going to take, I'd
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I second that. I've been yelling about it for years...
Same for the stupid assumption gnome2.eclass does with IUSE=doc for
gtk-doc
For reference, ye olde bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262491
--
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:06:23 +0200
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org wrote:
Il giorno mer, 14/09/2011 alle 12.38 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto:
Honestly, I'm ready to remove all relevant code in
autotools-utils.eclass and fix all ebuilds in gx86 Sunrise using
it. But if that's
Il giorno mer, 14/09/2011 alle 22.03 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto:
The main resolution as I see it, is to simply drop IUSE=static-libs
from a lot of ebuilds where static libs aren't actually required by
anything or anyone.
I would point at an old post of mine:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 16:03, Michał Górny wrote:
Well, the other thing is IUSE=static-libs. I don't like it either but
this is probably a bigger case than the other.
The main resolution as I see it, is to simply drop IUSE=static-libs
from a lot of ebuilds where static libs aren't actually