On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the
proper slot. Otherwise your package may pull in Qt5 while it may not
in fact support it.
This can be trouble if the
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure that they have the
proper slot. Otherwise your package may pull in Qt5
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in
the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure
On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
So what would be the methodology of making sure a package has the proper
slot?
Obviously you would need
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
So what would be the
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:27:49 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds
in the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to
On 28 July 2012 15:43, Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 14:27:49 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote:
In preparation for that, we want to ask
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted
for qt4 and qt5 useflags as the most straightforward and least
confusing.
Indeed, the flag qt has almost disappeared from the tree. Good to know.
On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted
for qt4 and qt5 useflags as the most straightforward and least
confusing.
Indeed, the flag qt has almost
Nikos Chantziaras posted on Sat, 28 Jul 2012 13:07:08 +0300 as excerpted:
On 28/07/12 12:27, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 15:54:07 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org
wrote:
We do not have (nor want to support) a qt useflag. We have opted for
qt4 and qt5 useflags as the most
10 matches
Mail list logo
