Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-11-04 Thread Thomas de Grenier de Latour
On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:56:23 -0600, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Caleb Cushing wrote: > > > maybe it would be a lot of work. to even develop the tools. but it > > would be nice if a global use flag could have a detailed option. > > this has been discussed a few times before. i think

[gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-11-03 Thread Ryan Hill
Caleb Cushing wrote: > maybe it would be a lot of work. to even develop the tools. but it > would be nice if a global use flag could have a detailed option. this has been discussed a few times before. i think there's even a bug for it (don't remember the #). > example. > > euse -i mplayer [+

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-10-30 Thread Jim Ramsay
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 05:23:50PM +0200, arfrever wrote: > In connection with latest globalization of mplayer USE flag I would like to > ask for globalizing cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. These flags are used > by enough amount of packages. I vote for a 'libnotify' global USE flag. It is u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-10-28 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 29/10/2006-05:26:52(+0200): Mart Raudsepp types > > The main problem in my eyes here is that with certain USE flags, the > description doesn't really convey what the user will get. > Many are in the form of "adds support for this optional thing" instead > of "by using this optional depend

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-10-28 Thread Caleb Cushing
And that's the problem - the user doesn't know what benefit will it bring her to use or not use a global USE flag for this particular package. yeah and it would be really nice to know these. I just thought of another useful feature. a flag for emerge that assumes --verbose but defines what the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-10-28 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Sat, 2006-10-28 at 17:12 -0400, Alec Warner wrote: > Caleb Cushing wrote: > >> > >> cairo and openexr, good idea, AFAIK. udev has come up before but from > >> that discussion, the flag means slightly different things in some cases. > >> Keeping it local allows individual per-pkg descriptions, s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-10-28 Thread Alec Warner
Caleb Cushing wrote: cairo and openexr, good idea, AFAIK. udev has come up before but from that discussion, the flag means slightly different things in some cases. Keeping it local allows individual per-pkg descriptions, so where it means something different, the description can say so. In b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-10-28 Thread Caleb Cushing
cairo and openexr, good idea, AFAIK. udev has come up before but from that discussion, the flag means slightly different things in some cases. Keeping it local allows individual per-pkg descriptions, so where it means something different, the description can say so. In both meanings, udev defau

[gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-10-28 Thread Duncan
arfrever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 28 Oct 2006 17:23:50 +0200: > In connection with latest globalization of mplayer USE flag I would like > to ask for globalizing cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. These flags are > used by enough amount of packages. >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Global USE flags (Was: mplayer global use flag)

2006-10-28 Thread arfrever
In connection with latest globalization of mplayer USE flag I would like to ask for globalizing cairo, openexr and udev USE flags. These flags are used by enough amount of packages. cairo - 11 packages openexr - 10 packages udev - 7 packages Each of these USE flags is used by bigger amount of pa