[gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

On 27/11/16 10:32, William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 06:41:20AM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> As I am sure everyone is aware by now, stabilisation requests on many >> architectures take a long time to be actioned. There are many factors >> contributing to this, but today I'd like

[gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

On 25/11/16 21:00, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:27:12PM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: >> On 25/11/16 17:51, Jason Zaman wrote: Automation == It's easy to forget to check that all the required dependencies are in stable before filing a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 20:05:55 +1100 Michael Palimaka wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean. A standardised format and a bot to repoman > check lists in this format is part of my original post. Ah. I didn't take enough care reading it and mostly replied on the earlier part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:27:12PM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote: > On 25/11/16 17:51, Jason Zaman wrote: > >> Automation > >> == > >> > >> It's easy to forget to check that all the required dependencies are in > >> stable before filing a stabilisation test, but this wastes the actioning >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

On 25/11/16 17:51, Jason Zaman wrote: >> Automation >> == >> >> It's easy to forget to check that all the required dependencies are in >> stable before filing a stabilisation test, but this wastes the actioning >> developer's time. I have prepared a bot that repoman checks the list of >>

[gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

On 25/11/16 18:51, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 14:40:36 +0800 > Jason Zaman wrote: > >> One way would be to use a plain text attachment with a standardized >> filename. If there are updates to the list then the new should obsolete >> the old and the script can

[gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

On 25/11/16 17:40, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 05:54:41PM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote: >> On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:41:20 +1100 >> Michael Palimaka wrote: >> >>> Example atom list from a bug with amd64, arm, and x86 in CC: >>> >>> =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 #

[gentoo-dev] Re: Improving the stabilisation process - part 1

On 25/11/16 15:54, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 06:41:20 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > >> Example atom list from a bug with amd64, arm, and x86 in CC: >> >> =app-foo/bar-1.2.3 # will be stabilised on amd64, arm, and x86 >> =app-foo/baz-2.3.4