Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 07 Nov
2006 10:03:59 -0500:
> Knowing about port 587 is half the battle (yeah, read the docs mike:).
> Getting it to work from the office with even more restrictive firewalls
> is another thing - but are we ac
Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 07 Nov
2006 07:24:37 -0500:
> Not an option for everyone without a lot of needless hoop jumping, like
> ssh port forwarding. Cox (rhyme it as you will), my cable provider,
> doesn't allow 25 to leave their net
On 11/7/06, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I accept that has been the position. As for devs not wanting to do it, I'm
thinking it would be part of the standard emerge process (ie binhost/PKGDIR
and -b) but you would need to add tagging of USE flags if the binary format
ATM does not include
On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 11:30:02 +
Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > My compiles as a dev are of very minimal use to anybody except me.
> > There are too many things that are specific to my systems.
> >
> Sure. Presumably you test packages with standard C-flags as
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> From all of the large Gentoo deployments I've done (one of which
> exceeded 200 machines), you're approaching this the wrong way.
> ...
Thanks for the concise and clear explanation. It's the first time I've read
a description of how Gentoo might be used on an entreprise le
On Sat, 2006-11-04 at 15:45 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> 3. The solution is for each enterprise to have their own tinderbox /
> build-machine. Tinderboxing is supported under catalyst, and I believe
> there is at least one other tinderbox implementation around.
> 4. (Assuming catalyst, as it's
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 08:47:52AM +, Steve Long wrote:
> As to why I don't just do it myself, I think it's a bit silly to duplicate
> the
> compile that devs do anyway.
My compiles as a dev are of very minimal use to anybody except me.
There are too many things that are specific to my system
On 11/3/06, Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Long wrote: [Fri Nov 03 2006, 02:47:52AM CST]
> The main problem I see is USE flags (devs already
> compile with standard C-flags right?) but I was thinking about standardising
> for 2 or 3 types of network- SOHO, medium and large enterp
Steve Long wrote: [Fri Nov 03 2006, 02:47:52AM CST]
> I appreciate that many will be against this idea, but I'd still like to
> discuss it: a binary repository for gentoo.
>
> Yes, I know gentoo is a meta-distro. And that there isn't loads of
> bandwidth. That's easily got round.
It is?
> The
On Friday 03 November 2006 03:47, Steve Long wrote:
> If gentoo is still serious about enterprise adoption
Gentoo as an entire whole is not really "serious" about anything
last i checked, it was the "server" project who was working on the
whole "enterprise" thing ... those guys are serious about
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
> vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
> Gentoo dev list to see.
>
I appreciate that many will be against this idea, but I'd still like to
discuss it: a binary repository for gen
11 matches
Mail list logo
