On Thursday 15 of July 2010 16:24:08 Mike Auty wrote:
> On 15/07/10 14:57, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> > And what about using portage 2.2 and be done with it. I don't see the
> > point in reinventing the wheel yet again.
>
> I'm using portage-2.2 and have been since it first came out. I find the
>
Maciej Mrozowski posted on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:01 +0200 as excerpted:
> On Thursday 15 of July 2010 12:14:29 Duncan wrote:
>>
>> If I have FEATURE=-preserve-libs, that's what I want. Exceptions
>> should be limited to what will break the toolchain (including
>> revdep-rebuild here, since that
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:24:08 +0100, Mike Auty
wrote:
>
> If portage offers a way to turn off functionality (like preserving
> libraries), it should actually turn it off, rather than sometimes turn
> it off...
Yes, you are referring to
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326275 I do believe t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/07/10 14:57, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> And what about using portage 2.2 and be done with it. I don't see the point
> in
> reinventing the wheel yet again.
I'm using portage-2.2 and have been since it first came out. I find the
@set notation i
On Thursday 15 of July 2010 12:14:29 Duncan wrote:
> Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:09:39 +0200 as
>
> excerpted:
> > Le jeudi 15 juillet 2010 à 09:49 +0100, Mike Auty a écrit : [...]
> >
> >> I can live with this for in places where it causes massive breakage
> >> (openssl/l
Gilles Dartiguelongue posted on Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:09:39 +0200 as
excerpted:
> Le jeudi 15 juillet 2010 à 09:49 +0100, Mike Auty a écrit : [...]
>> I can live with this for in places where it causes massive breakage
>> (openssl/libpng/libjpg), because it's genuinely useful, but I think it
>> shou
