[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5

2008-07-08 Thread Ali Polatel
> Hi, Hey! > dev-lang/python 2.5 is going stable with arches cced on > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=178800>. File your > stabilisation requests that were postponed because of Python 2.5 in > testing and make it block above bug. Please test a lot and at least > report for x86 on stable

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5 unmasked

2007-08-25 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 14:53 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote: > Definitly the python herd seems understaffed even ruby (as a much less > popular language) has more members. This was a good week for the python > herd nice job! > Obviously ruby is much more fun than python, so there should be more people

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5 unmasked

2007-08-25 Thread Luis Medinas
On Sat, 2007-08-25 at 12:43 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: > Luis Medinas wrote: > > > Nice to know this, python 2.4 is really broken for us but python 2.5 is > > the right thing to do imo. Too bad it took too much to unmask it. > > Well, finally some good people joined the python-herd and helped w

[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5 unmasked

2007-08-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Luis Medinas wrote: > Nice to know this, python 2.4 is really broken for us but python 2.5 is > the right thing to do imo. Too bad it took too much to unmask it. Well, finally some good people joined the python-herd and helped with testing and fixing instead of just grumbling around. signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Python 2.5 unmasked

2007-08-25 Thread Tiziano Müller
Thomas Anderson wrote: > Thanks! > Is there any roadmap for stabilizing python-2.5(as in weeks,months, > decades?) ;) Well, I guess we should just apply the usual "30 days rule" here. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.