On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:22:30 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:07:07 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
If the name is omitted, then we lose that; that is not the way
forward.
I'm pretty sure we already addressed this in another branch of this
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 00:07:07 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
If the name is omitted, then we lose that; that is not the way
forward.
I'm pretty sure we already addressed this in another branch of this
thread. Bringing up the workings of IRC bots doesn't add anything.
jer
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 22:53:13 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:30:04 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:18:55 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
herdemailf...@gentoo.org/email/herd
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:18:55 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
herdemailf...@gentoo.org/email/herd
herdname.../nameemail.../email/herd
to keep willikins' !meta -v functionality working.
On Sun, 5 Oct 2014 18:30:04 +0200
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014 09:18:55 +0200
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
herdemailf...@gentoo.org/email/herd
herdname.../nameemail.../email/herd
to keep willikins' !meta -v functionality working.
You mean we should
On Fri, 3 Oct 2014 03:51:41 +0100
Steven J. Long sl...@rathaus.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
It's not clear what problem you're trying to solve, apart from
removing all herd tags from every ebuild's metadata.xml.
You must have read it wrong, then.
The idea is to cut out herds.xml when looking up
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
If people are that attached to herd then we should apparently fix it
instead of removing it, possibly by making it closely resemble
maintainer.
Well to do that you need to clear up that ontological discussion
which is nothing more than defining what
Steven J. Long wrote:
it's a bit late for that
It's never too late to improve.
//Peter
