Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using your analogy you should then recognise that there is a strong
dislike for pink and should seek a new colour that allows the building
of said extensions.
And what colour would
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:16:22 +0100
Federico Ferri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry if this has already suggested.
It has. It solves nothing.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, 2007-12-29 at 23:20 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 00:16:22 +0100
Federico Ferri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry if this has already suggested.
It has. It solves nothing.
If it solves nothing you should at least post a link to the post you
made explaining so,
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 04:16 -0500, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On 12/25/07, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. So do you use an EAPI 0 environment to do the sourcing, or an EAPI
1 environment, or what?
If it's that such a big deal, then simply ensure that
Thankyou for reading and
Roy Marples wrote:
I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
Do you count version as metadata?
Cheers,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub more beer /dev/mouth
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Roy Marples wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 04:16 -0500, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On 12/25/07, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. So do you use an EAPI 0 environment to do the sourcing, or an EAPI
1 environment, or what?
If it's that such a big deal, then simply ensure
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 16:39 +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Roy Marples wrote:
I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
Do you count version as metadata?
No.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Jan Kundrát a écrit :
Roy Marples wrote:
I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
Do you count version as metadata?
I'll bite :)
Version numbers aren't metadata because they uniquely identify
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 16:32 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:04:52 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
Alright, so where
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:04:52 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand that metadata in a file name is pure and simple hackery
that has no place here and the GLEP is a flimsy attempt to justify it.
Alright, so where would you stick EAPI such that all the requirements
that've
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 16:50 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:45:06 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, so where would you stick EAPI such that all the
requirements that've previously been described are met?
I neither know, nor care.
I just
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 16:45:06 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alright, so where would you stick EAPI such that all the
requirements that've previously been described are met?
I neither know, nor care.
I just feel very strongly that the current proposal is wrong, and no
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:27:05 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I can smell a blatant hack that is just wrong to the bone like a
lot of other people here.
Clearly not... As you say, you don't care to understand any of this.
You're just jumping in because you think you know what a
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Or to put it another way, you're objecting to painting the house
pink rather than green because you don't like pink (because your
last house was green too),
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Or to put it another way, you're objecting to painting the house pink
rather than green because you don't like pink (because your last house
was green too), ignoring that it's been demonstrated that when painted
green, it's impossible
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 18:11 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Or to put it another way, you're objecting to painting the house
pink rather than green because you
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 18:11 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:03:27 +
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-27 at 17:43 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Or to put it another way, you're objecting to painting the house
pink rather than green because you
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 02:43 -0500, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Dec 25, 2007 2:38 AM, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 02:26 -0500, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Dec 24, 2007 7:53 AM, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to obtain EAPI from .ebuild you would always
On 12/25/07, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok. So do you use an EAPI 0 environment to do the sourcing, or an EAPI
1 environment, or what?
If it's that such a big deal, then simply ensure that
Thankyou for reading and understanding the GLEP before jumping in and
commenting.
--
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:03:12 +
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Set the EAPI inside the ebuild in a way that makes it easy to
fetch it This is ok as atm only EAPI=1 is in the tree, so there is no
backward compatibility issue.
It's both a backwards and a
Just picked this particular email to reply with my thoughts on this
thread.
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 10:52 +, Steve Long wrote:
But they come under the scope of this discussion, since this is about the
long-term future of *every* EAPI. So let's discuss them
Impossible. History has proven
On Dec 24, 2007 7:53 AM, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to obtain EAPI from .ebuild you would always do
EAPI=`. /path/to/ebuild.ebuild; echo ${EAPI}`
Doesn't work with current ebuilds, nor future ebuilds. No points!
--
Ciaran McCreesh
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 02:26 -0500, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Dec 24, 2007 7:53 AM, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to obtain EAPI from .ebuild you would always do
EAPI=`. /path/to/ebuild.ebuild; echo ${EAPI}`
Doesn't work with current ebuilds, nor future ebuilds. No points!
Works
On Dec 25, 2007 2:38 AM, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-25 at 02:26 -0500, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Dec 24, 2007 7:53 AM, Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So to obtain EAPI from .ebuild you would always do
EAPI=`. /path/to/ebuild.ebuild; echo ${EAPI}`
24 matches
Mail list logo
