On Monday 06 October 2008 16:07:14 Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Does it *really* matter if these under-staffed odd arches
have a stable tree or not? If there is a problem with a stable package
right now, will there be a new version marked stable in a reasonable
amount of time? I think we can conclude
El lun, 06-10-2008 a las 23:13 +, Duncan escribió:
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:07:14 -0500:
AFAIK, it is incorrect right now to exclude s390, arm, sh, etc on
stablereqs right now..But, I ask this question to the dev
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:44:51 -0500
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest moving all the slacking arches to experimental
until there is desire from the dev community (read: manpower) to
support a stable tree
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:44:51 -0500
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest moving all the slacking arches to experimental
until there is desire from the dev community (read: manpower) to
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Mon, 06 Oct 2008 15:07:14 -0500:
AFAIK, it is incorrect right now to exclude s390, arm, sh, etc on
stablereqs right now..But, I ask this question to the dev community:
Why? There are ~190 open bugs with s390 as
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:44:51 -0500
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest moving all the slacking arches to experimental
until there is desire from the dev community (read: manpower) to
support a stable tree again. Until then, it seems pretty pointless to
keep assigning bugs to
