Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Status of xcb

2007-08-28 Thread Thomas Kuther 
On Sa, 25.08.07 12:33 Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hanno Böck wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
  While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
  https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
  I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we
  make xcb default?
 
 Is there a save way to change from non-xcb to xcb?
 I'm asking because last time I changed from xcb to non-xcb (because I
 needed java for a project), only un-setting the xcb USE-flag and
 rebuilding the packages with changed USE-flags didn't really help but
 I rather had to rebuild all gnome-/gtk-packages manually. Otherwise I
 got the nice xcb-lock errors everywhere.
 
 Cheers,
 Tiziano

I use the proposed libxcb patch from the b.g.o. bug entry.. both, java
and xcb work fine.

Cheers,
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Status of xcb

2007-08-25 Thread Tiziano Müller 
Hanno Böck wrote:

 Hi,
 
 With compiz 0.5.4, we get the first version that depends on xcb.
 While we still have an open bug asking for use-masking xcb
 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174434
 I'd like to open the question just the other way round: When can we make
 xcb default?

Is there a save way to change from non-xcb to xcb?
I'm asking because last time I changed from xcb to non-xcb (because I needed
java for a project), only un-setting the xcb USE-flag and rebuilding the
packages with changed USE-flags didn't really help but I rather had to
rebuild all gnome-/gtk-packages manually. Otherwise I got the
nice xcb-lock errors everywhere.

Cheers,
Tiziano


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.