Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Dale
Duncan wrote: Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted: It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whithers on the vine and nothing much happens. There may be a need for -project

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Dale
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote: On 19 July 2010 01:27, Duncan<1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted: It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Piotr Jaroszyński
On 19 July 2010 01:27, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted: > >> It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for >> them to just go away.  Once a thread goes to -project, it just whithers >> on the vine and nothi

[gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Duncan
Dale posted on Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500 as excerpted: > It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for > them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whithers > on the vine and nothing much happens. There may be a need for -project > but if almost

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Dale
Petteri Räty wrote: On 07/18/2010 05:21 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: Hi, Theo Chatzimichos: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: What about getting rid of -project? V-Li WHAT? Why?? Because it is useless in my eyes. All

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Petteri Räty
On 07/18/2010 05:21 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > Theo Chatzimichos : > >> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer >> wrote: >>> What about getting rid of -project? >>> >>> V-Li >> >> WHAT? Why?? > > Because it is useless in my eyes. All discussion could also take >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Theo Chatzimichos : > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer > wrote: > >  What about getting rid of -project? > > > > V-Li > > WHAT? Why?? Because it is useless in my eyes. All discussion could also take place here and most people mix it up anyway. The distinction is too

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote: >  What about getting rid of -project? > > V-Li WHAT? Why??

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900 UTC

2010-07-18 Thread Christian Faulhammer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" : > I cross-posted this email to both gentoo-dev and gentoo-council mls as > Brian used the former and Alex started this thread in the latter. > Which ML do we want to use? What about getting rid of -project? V-Li